Wednesday, December 27, 2023

The Savage Movie Of Solomon Kane!


The Solomon Kane movie was released in 2009, but not in any theater on the North American continent. Now finally we have access to this robust Robert E. Howard adaptation by means of a much belated DVD release. James Purefoy is ideally cast as Howard's dour Puritan reaver. His face, his demeanor, his physical skills all communicate effectively the somber power of one of REH's most ferocious creations. Preceding Conan, Solomon Kane has always been a favorite of mine, mostly because his adventures are set in the "real" world. Admittedly it's a world filled with all manner of dark magic, but it's also a world in which God and Satan and all between are very much a palpable part of the landscape. 


Purefoy says he was convinced to play the part when he saw the production artwork above showing the relentless Solomon Kane battling a bevy of flesh-rending ghouls. It's a wild scene, which is realized in somewhat less blood and thunder fashion in the actual movie.


This movie doesn't adapt any particular Kane story, so don't view expecting to see parts of "Red Shadows", "The Hills of the Dead", or any other lusty Howard story. The director Michael Bassett said his brief from the producers was to create an origin story for Kane which would then lead into a few more movies adapting the actual Howard material. Howard speaks little of Kane's back story, other than to suggest he has lived a most adventurous life across the expanse of the whole world.


This movie shows us Kane as a boy, shows us Kane's father and family, shows us his life before he commits himself to God and becomes the devout red-handed slayer of the Howard stories. Kane was in his own words "an evil evil man" and we see that in the early stages of the story. But the movie then shows us how this man strives for redemption and the tale takes us through his awkward stages to an awakening of his destiny in the world, which is to battle evil, the very evil he once embraced so joyously.

The movie offers up monsters galore in a world bristling with white and black magic. We get a sword-wielding demon from Satan, a haggard witch, a mysterious and mighty rider, blood-thirsty ghouls, a wicked sorcerer, and even a full-blown giant monster. Not all the threats seem as natural to Kane's worlds as they ought, but most do. If the movie has any significant weakness it is the finale which is paced well, but seems somewhat different in tone than what had preceded it.

The late Pete Postlethwaite is typically effective in his brief but significant role, likewise a somber Max Von Sydow. Alice Krige and Jason Fleming are also on hand in a movie which is exceedingly well cast. James Purefoy leads this cast and shows us the misery of Solomon Kane right down to his scarred and battered skin. His voice rolls out in a compelling baritone which demands attention and his ability to glare is most impressive. The movie is very very well acted, the true strength of the effort.

The snow flies and the rain falls almost throughout the movie giving the whole affair a bleak texture which reinforces the themes of general despair which lurks around every corner. But finding that small light of hope in this unusually scarred landscape is what the journey of this movie is all about.


Without spoiling a really good ride, all I can say is that if the Kane we know is not with us at the beginning he most certainly is by the end.

Yet More Kane later today. 

Rip Off

4 comments:

  1. I didn't know the Solomon Kane movie wasn't released in North America! Here in the UK it was released as far as I know but I watched it on DVD in 2010 and I thought it was rather good - better than any of the Conan films in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember reading about it when it was in production and yearned to see it, only to be frustrated. It was worth the wait I'm glad to say.

      Delete
  2. Some of these could be considered downright horror stories. I managed to buy an early DVD of the Kane film through a source that specializes in hard-to-find movies (because it was hard to find at the time). While I like the first Conan film, I agree with Colin that SK is more solid overall. I'm still not settled on Arnold as Conan. I did meet him and Maria once in SoCal years ago while I was working at a store. The film hadn't been out long, so I asked him how he liked being in it. He said he loved it because he "got to play with swords all day"! This may be out of left field, but I always thought Charles Bronson would have made a good Conan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nix on the Bronson as Conan idea. I've heard that over the years and I just cannot picture it in my head. I was an Arnold doubter myself, but I have to say reading the stories this last time, I found myself picturing him. He's a tad muscle bound, but large enough and that's hard to do. At the time his vocal acting was just so limited. I'd agree that Solomon Kane might well be the best big feature drawn from REH's stuff. It's got the right atmosphere.

      Delete