Sunday, November 16, 2025

The Big-Screen Spirit!


When The Spirit was released to the cinemas a nearly two decades ago now, I was hopeful that some of Will Eisner's greatest creation would be translated to the big screen at long last.  I'm not naive enough to imagine that the translation would be seamless or that I'd be completely happy, but I held out hope that given a solid comic book man like Frank Miller was in charge, that the essence of the character would remain.

I hoped in vain.


The Spirit we meet on the screen (Gabriel Macht) is a mopey self-absorbed hipster who bounces around town in his overly stylish tennis shoes like a noir Spider-Man. He's got some fetish for "his city" and waxes on endlessly about how he and the city are connected. (A bit too much of the Batman-brew for me.) That would be okay, save that this connection is largely ignored after an overly long set up.


As bad though as The Spirit is, the Octopus (Samuel L. Jackson) is a disaster. The mysterious largely unseen villain of the comics is transformed into a loquacious maniac who kills for sheer delight. Both he and the Spirit it seems have been transformed into supermen of a sort and battle each other out of some grand ennui which more than anything else seems to inform this culture. The city and its occupants seem bored, and the audience cannot be far behind.


The women though are beautiful -- Eva Mendes as Sand Saref, Sarah Paulson as Dr. Ellen Dolan, Paz Vega as Plaster of Paris, Jamie King as Lorelei Rox, and Scarlet Johansson as Silken Floss. The filmmaking is at least stylish and visually arresting in places, but overall, The Spirit as imagined by Frank Miller rambles too far from the source material and finds itself lost. It's a rather dull story actually with some clever set pieces which after it's all said and done don't add up to a good movie. The Spirit deserved better. 

It's a shame really. Will never saw it. That's probably a blessing.

Rip Off

12 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Miller let in too much of himself and too little of Eisner.

      Delete
  2. Only good thing in this movie is Eva Mendes' bare ass.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is one of most disappointing comic book to movie adaptions for me. I was really looking forward to this at the time, I'm just glad I didn't go to the cinema to see it and just picked up the DVD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I did see it in the cinema and I was grinding my teeth the entire time.

      Delete
  4. I’ve seen both live-action versions of The Spirit, and I remember enjoying the TV movie (maybe because I wasn’t expecting much). This movie, however, felt like I wasted my time. Looked cool, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TV movie gets my vote as the better of the two.

      Delete
  5. I agree totally with your assessment of this film. I say it when it was released, and have never had a desire to watch it again. Miller is no director, and the script was terrible. In my opinion it was a mistake to make this look too much like Sin City. I can't remember Steranko's exact quote about the Spirit, but the gist was that Eisner had his character, tongue in cheek, even when beating the crap out of the bad guys. There was absolutely no humor whatsoever in this movie, which it sorely needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think there was supposed to be humor, it was just a deeply cynical sarcasm which is not The Spirit kind of humor.

      Delete
  6. It seems to me by now that The Spirit is best left to the printed page.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Suits me fine, but a good movie is still possible by the right people.

      Delete